As the noose tightens around me and Jens has already made the allegations to which I have waited a long time will, I reveal to you the truth about my relationship with Lili and also tell some as yet unknown actions of the traffickers. The manner in which this relationship has been interrupted, has key importance for the detection of forced prostitution during the Hungarians.
I assume Lili gave testimony really. I know these statements yet, but it certainly does say what their bosses wanted her. Therefore, I refer to Jens Kommnetar on the subject. He claims that on the phone with Lili, before registration of his commentary of 17 Jannuary has spoken (I'm assuming that he can also prove). The conclusion should be: I have fallen in love with Lili, and therefore it has not opened the door for me, apparently because they did not want me.
have in my information to BKA from 22.04.2010 I wrote a text message from Lili, she sent me in the evening, in which according to Jens, it has not opened the door for me. In it she wrote that she wanted to sleep, apologized and invited me to a wine for the next day. At the first meeting with BKA I expected that Dietmar Schmidt and his partners would be interested in this text, because my relationship with Lili was Importance for possible investigation. Since they were not interested (as for the Hungarians at all) I've done on my own initiative, and both remarked that it was clear that I had friendly relations with Lili.
Jens and his Hungarian partner know very well about this SMS, as this SMS and the SMS that I sent Lili on her birthday, next to the dinner, have meant that Lili is no longer brought to Leipzig. My phone conversation with her was on 15.01.2010 has not hurt much.
But why Jens said that I had not a friendly relationship with Lili, but an undesirable for them Man, if it was such a text message there? The explanation is simple. On 24 June was a furniture dealer to my apartment, which should now take away my furniture. About 15 minutes before his arrival, I had the last time a conversation with my phone. After the furniture retailer had left my apartment, I wanted to call and had to find that the phone was gone. I remembered that in a going out of the room where the phone was, the dealer had a very happy, almost smiling face. My phone was quite common and cheap. I went to the furniture store but the man was not there. His employees called him and informed him that I wanted my phone back otherwise I would go to the police. The clerk handed me his answer, that I could go to the police. The I 25 Made in June to see how they can. I described to the police the situation and given the name and business address of the furniture retailer. The policeman said it was not worth an investigation because such a cheap phone to perform. I replied that I especially information Händy needed, and that we should stop the man, because you did not know what he would steal it. I informed that I leave Germany, and gave an e-mail address for future contact. As of today I have no answer Dato received from the police.
It was for me as strange that a furniture dealer and his client could do something like that, especially because his business was good - such a small theft could jeopardize his entire business. He seemed very calm. I remembered how the partner Dieter Schmidt warned me not to complain about my broken relationship with Lili, because I did not know what she would say. But no matter what she would say, I had her SMS. The policeman knew that I knew.
All these circumstances led me to the idea that the theft of my cheap mobile phones for the purpose of removal the SMS should serve as proof. I had already begun to contact women's organizations, to seek redress on my experience with BKA, BKA and clear was that I had not given up. Were these circumstances evidence to assert such a thing? I think not.
mean the allegations by Jens for me but that he knows very well that this text does not exist any more. I'm almost only fit my suspicions to the free rein to give, but I will first answer the question whether Jens has no problem with the fact that this SMS two BKA officers was shown and could confirm that they may. I voted against the 8th February Dieter Schmidt sent an e-mail in which I him for his opinion on the question asked. I'll show you the e-mail is not just because I feel, that the publication is the e-mail address of a police officer threaten the operational capacity of the police. I have so far got no response and I do not think it makes sense to wait. Dietmar Schmidt wants to confirm the truth, even though I had given my information to him in the Hungarian phone number, real name and the birthday of Lili. Jens BKA need not fear.
The only thing left to me, the truth is to talk to themselves and to show above all. What neither BKA the police in Leipzig and even Jens know is that an expression of the SMS has been made in time, the scan ned text I see here. I repeat here the text without the error: "Dear Vladimir! Excuse me, but I was in my room. Do not be evil, but I want to sleep now. Tomorrow we drink wine. Thank you for the food. Hope you understand this beautiful sleep! "These two lines are key to the truth, for they show clearly that at the time of our separation Lili liked me and wanted to see me again. They point out that the allegations of Jens have nothing to do with the truth. These are the lines that are seen Dietmar Schmidt and his partner, but have not been documented and confirmed by the Dietmar Schmidt does not want. These are the lines for which my phone was stolen.
order but they may interpret this SMS even better, I will explain the relevant circumstances.
I had for the evening on 19/11/2009 an appointment with Lili for a second: shared dinner, again with her friend Michelle, with whom she shared an apartment. I came to them, Michelle opened the door, said that Lili was a customer and asked me about half an hour to come back. I gave Michelle brought the food and wine and left. Michelle looked anxious and it was strange for me that I had to wait outside in the cold. After about ten minutes I got the SMS.
Jens knows much better what happened behind the scenes, but this text is the result of the fact that Lili was made quite clear that there will be no second dinner with me and I can not come in as a guest.
The number is a Hungarian Mobile phone number, the Lili at least in the period November 2009 - has used Jannuary 2010th I do not know if it really is Lili or organization. The Hungarian women are prohibited to give their numbers to the Hungarian customers. I know this because despite my offer has never called Lili, when they needed something, but waited until I called. All communication through these phones - calls, SMS, etc., the organization announced. From its German mobile phones can only receive calls, the Hungarians. Lili made the mistake of sending me this text message because they are so disturbed and must have been confused by the fact that the man with whom she had brought food, and had appointment had to be sent behind the door that they just lost the caution. Her condition is also seen in the text, the errors in this text. Many of these errors have nothing to do with their German language skills, which are now well. She's just been too nervous. And many (especially for an SMS) excuses are clear indication that the wife felt very uncomfortable about the situation that had nothing to do with their will. This is Lili - a very good, ethical and well-mannered woman. She is so decent, that the wine of mine, whom she loved very much, did not drink in my absence. Jens, you have unlimited power over women, but sometimes, especially when it comes to third people, but you have to think. If you had told Lili, I remember sending away within three meetings I would not - yes women change their settings. But not a normal woman, and especially Lili, a relationship will break the way one of their demands added.
The next day I made a customer visit to Lili. I say that not the two women were alone. The rule for the Hungarians is the money the customer immediately remove from the room. During my last visit was Lili the money in the room - they simply had to fully trust me. This they did according to the rules. And it has lasted much longer than usual, until she returned. They offered me no wine, and since I know him well, I know that she was not allowed that. She had to bring our relationship to customer the task level. It has fulfilled the task of mechanically and with a view to the ground. Reasons - it is only for the Money, it is not right for me, I must choose a better, etc. Surprisingly, for me they asked me if I visited to collect information (which I did not at that time and I watched no uncomfortable questions answered ). I asked her if she had heard from her boss. She answered nothing, only smiled and I knew that I should watch the interview. Since they apparently felt humiliated, I emphasized my respect for them. When they parted company, I realized that had not changed between us. But none of us knew that it was the last meeting.
I would add that we both are on my Initiative, the appointment, when Lili had received other visits in the time of our appointments, to take it, because I did not visit other women and I lived alone. Since I had noticed that they had difficult moments, I had also encouraged to do so if they felt uncomfortable to me to say this, so that we could postpone the appointment for another time.
This SMS is the proof that my connection to Lili, even against their will and their bosses has been broken and that Lili is a forced prostitute who has to continue to provide for the traffickers no right to personal life. It is only a Hungarian by the forced prostitution of about 1000 which I tell in this blog. I say that all statements of Lili, contrary to these two lines, to their complete dependence on and forced by their traffickers based and therefore not to be valid. They are also untrue but the blame for this, only the traffickers, not the woman who acted under their coercion. Just like these people, the women to dangerous and Sexpraktikken to 24 hours working days to force to force just as they give women the false statements against their will. Forced prostitution can not exist without violence and coercion. I maintain that the whole treatment of these women is a brutal violation of human rights and the laws of Germany and Switzerland and thus constitutes a serious crime.
Except that they are completely untrue, I have some comments on the allegations made by Jens. First, if his claim is true but, why not come to Leipzig Lili? If I harass the woman and thus violates the policy, there are the police, as far as I know, there are also the guard of Jens, which may come within two minutes. Second, when Lili and I did not want the "realities of life" could not accept why I am not on Lili become evil, but to Jens, the Hungarians and the "rule of law"? Limited intellect enough so an act not determined. Third, even without this SMS, and only based on my knowledge of the real name, birthday and the phone number that the woman used, at least, one can see that there was reciprocity in the relationship. The SMS adds only that this reciprocity was also the time of separation. Meanwhile, independent and Eastern European women rarely give such information concerning it. Fourth, the fact that Jens told about the statements he made as if it does, the question of its participation in these statements.
Now I get to the most important and thus the focus of this blog - the participation of state authorities in trafficking. I must confess that I had no doubt that Dietmar Schmidt, the SMS is not confirmed. Even so, because a confirmation will also be a recognition that BKA knew of forced prostitution and has done nothing, which in the case of the police is like a support. If BKA really wanted to make the police work that officers would document this SMS with my statements. Both officers have ever been no notes, asked almost no questions about anything and I needed to sign. It is very significant that they even tell me the identity of the woman who to me about the violence tells against the Hungarians and Romanians had not have asked. Instead, they have "asked" Leipzig to their identity, which inevitably led to their intimidation. Like Fedpol, they even wanted to have any information about the Hungarians from me. The electronic records of my information, I, as with the SMS on my own initiative I sent after my return. Otherwise I would not be able to prove the transfer of my information to BKA. It would be interesting to the documents by federal police with regard to look at the two meetings with me, if they exist, because I doubt it. If there is something essential in BKA there would be no sense of the theft of my mobile and do not take place. Any experienced investigators will find that BKA from the beginning had no intention at all to be determined. That the two officers are twice driven from Wiesbaden to Eisenach had to make to me his reasons, but trafficking was not among them. At the first meeting they wanted to find out whether I acted alone, or any foreign bodies in the back had to determine their action. At the second meeting they wanted me to explain exactly why it would be better for me to give up. has, in the case with the Hungarians BKA or no policing or the simulation made of such. And to pass the practice on the identity of the applicant before registration of the contacts is prohibited.
the role of BKA I've seen because of the lie about the nonexistent Fedpol officials Beat Humbel. Here is the e-mail I received just a few hours after my conversation with Fedpol. coordinate all details of my attempts at contact with Fedpol and can only come from Fedpol. But as I said, there is no Fedpol employees called Beat Humbel and none of Fedpol used the e-mail address. Dietmar Schmidt, however, said the first meeting (without the name Beat Humbel have heard of me) that he had spoken to beat and that they had both agreed that I will present all information to BKA.
I feel that Dietmar Schmidt also confirmed this fact is not, I have attached a Email to "Beat Humbel," in which I the "Beat" tell exactly it. In another mail I send from here Dietmar Schmidt, according to his instructions Switzerland-specific materials. On the same attachment can be seen how much BKA interesssierte whether Vladimir, who had turned to Fedpol, and Günter, through intermediaries who had turned to BKA, were the same person. Can you guess what happens with the Vladimir would do if he were not also Günter? also sought information are identical to the Jeniger of Annex "beat". The e-mail address I partially deleted as I did in spite of all the operational capacity by federal police will not harm but Dietmar Schmidt and his colleagues know that she is the right one.
has the behavior of the two police officers at the second meeting with me prompted the question whether a person had both a daughter. It has been found that the partner was the father of a girl. I asked him how he will feel as a father, if one day his daughter is so ill-treated like this bedauersnswerten women.
The police justified their inability to find evidence of criminal offense, arguing that they followed my request, not to mention me of Leipzig. First, if they really sought evidence that they had to start from where there is evidence as a result of a successful investigation was already - from Augsburg. Second, their arguments disclosed to do anything that they actually very intensive contact information Leipzig had to and that can also be detected. Some of the information known to them could only come from Jens. I followed the flow of information and so I made it clear to me the structure and the decision procedure of the system, which facilitated my further actions. Third, when the Hungarians knew BKA anyway, the question arises as for so its activity is not a violation of German law. If his work on pure agrees with the law, why he does not feel insulted by me? And he has paid a single tax € in Germany on the money he earned in the country? Some of my German clients earned as little as EUR 1100 per month and had yet their taxes . Pay Why are the prostitutes, most of which are legally independent, not taxed like other self-employed, but pay a symbolic tax? My answer is - so they can deliver more money to their bosses, because anyway keep the prostitutes with little money for themselves and their bosses who pay no taxes, the big money pass up. By the way, a normal taxation of prostitution would normalize the situation of women. But you just will not, they just want more money from the women. Fourthly, the disappearance of all known by me Hungarians days only after I mentioned her name to BKA (not off operations), was certainly not good Solution - it was also clear to me that my information came to the traffickers.
And if it was a misunderstanding, Dietmar Schmidt could contact me and explain, even as I began my Korrepondenz with women's organizations, very well knowing that my information was forwarded to BKA. He did not do so.
As for the circumstances I have described, I would have no great Schlußfogerungen itself. I leave it to them.
The ones who, like me, are inclined to think that the move successfully furniture dealer has stolen my cheap cell phone not because of the commercial value, but because of the SMS, I have to explicitly warn them that will make a conclusion inevitably to the conclusion that I was the theft under observation in the period or, more likely that my phones were tapped. I myself have chosen the furniture retailer, he came to me, we have suited us and made the appointment for a few days later. There were also phone calls. But this is another gross violation of the laws is part of the authorities, because I say that I was wrapped up in any of the activities or contacts, the legal could give grounds for such action.
the others who believe that it has simply added together cases with me, tell me more of a coincidence.
BKA has my identity on 12 April found. I am certified insurance specialist in Germany and at that time I had a new agency with one of the German insurance companies. On 23 April, I received a letter from the department, which you informed me that they took from me my commission guarantee. The date of the letter was the 20 April. They gave no reason for the decision, the Area Director said that he had nothing to do with this decision (my Guarantee commission was paid by his budget) and no one had talked to me like me or notified of any procedure. All this was very surprising happened to me but because everything in life, I wanted to draw any conclusions. I also had anyway decided to leave Germany, and the change was not of practical importance for me. But as Dieter Schmidt on 2 June was our second meeting on the motorway near Eisenach asked me angry when I would finally leave Germany, I knew why I had lost my commission warranty - the traffickers state had equal access. After any logic it was thought in BKA that if I Germany leave would solve the problem with my meddling. So the traffickers, the BKA control needed, just a few days to a private institution that had nothing to do with their work, set against me. In my letter to the deputies of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of 13 January, I wrote that "at least in Germany, all institutions, public and private, must look into the demands of the traffickers, because they have the power."
0 comments:
Post a Comment