scheidungsfix.de lock exchange permitted by the landlord. No claim for compensation for use
tenants can breathe in the future: another law was passed, which is contrary to the tenant and the landlord in his restricts freedom of action: According to new tenancy, it is landlords are no longer allowed to perform without further exchange of a lock in an apartment. The real estate www.myimmo.de reports on the new law.
Until recently it was possible to landlords to carry out a lock replacement without losing the right to compensation for use. According to the verdict of the Berlin Court of Appeal in the future will no longer be possible. Previously, the lock exchange was declared because of rent arrears by the Higher Regional Court in Karlsruhe declared illegal. In the case of the owners had the apartment ( http://www.myimmo.de/ratgeber/lexikon/wohnung ) his client issued a dismissal. This, however, refused to move out. As a consequence of the property owners had to replace the locks and filed a claim for compensation for use of former residents.
(...)
http://redir.is/HN @ right
Friday, January 29, 2010
Robert Stanley Designer Ribbon
clause terminating the gas supply for failure to pay the gas bill is ineffective
The Federal Court has ruled that including a clause to adjust the gas supply in case of failure to pay the gas bill is ineffective if the clause of mandatory legal requirements of the general conditions the supply of gas customers is different.
This decision is remarkable and has the view of the law firm attorney general immediately significance in light of the condition of utility plants. In the case decided
used a gas company, the following clause:
"IX. Setting the supply
first E. Others entitled for breach of payment obligations in spite of reminder in accordance with § 19 para 2 GasGVV to stop the gas supply four weeks after the threat to leave [clause 1]. The re-opening in these cases on a regular basis only if the open gas delivery claims and the cost of supply adjustment and the re-opening have been paid in full. "(...)
http://redir.is/sv @ right
The Federal Court has ruled that including a clause to adjust the gas supply in case of failure to pay the gas bill is ineffective if the clause of mandatory legal requirements of the general conditions the supply of gas customers is different.
This decision is remarkable and has the view of the law firm attorney general immediately significance in light of the condition of utility plants. In the case decided
used a gas company, the following clause:
"IX. Setting the supply
first E. Others entitled for breach of payment obligations in spite of reminder in accordance with § 19 para 2 GasGVV to stop the gas supply four weeks after the threat to leave [clause 1]. The re-opening in these cases on a regular basis only if the open gas delivery claims and the cost of supply adjustment and the re-opening have been paid in full. "(...)
http://redir.is/sv @ right
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)